Was It Only The ‘Ceremonial Law’ That Was Nailed to The Cross?

Right, what is this alleged ‘Stylized Law’? Is it Scriptural or is it hu-man made? Was there a ‘Transitory Law’ that some additionally strangely guarantee? Did this law exist as a different substance or as a sub-division of The Whole Law in Old Covenant times? Did Moses convey a two phase variant of The Whole Law? Has this affirmed ‘Stately Law’ been intentionally evoked the Judaising scholars of the later hundreds of years to confound and trick True Believers and supporters of The Way? The Way, being that of basically and Graciously following Yashua Anointed as our Friend, Elder Brother and Savior for example placing our absolute trust and confidence in Him for everything?

Alright, so how about we look at this plan to check whether it holds any water. My theory is that it will not, however how about we investigate see to ensure, so we can tell these abhorrent individuals where they can go. That is considerately, obviously, else they will rapidly blame us for not showing the Fruits of The Spirit. ROFL. Quit worrying about that they don’t have any of that Spirit at any rate, yet there you go. Life is brimming with numerous bizarre and ‘magnificent’ shocks, is it not?

2 Chron 33:8 (KJV) Neither will I any more eliminate the foot of Israel from out of the land which I have selected for your dads; so they will notice to do all that I have Commanded them, as per The Whole Law and the resolutions and the laws by the hand of Moses. (All Emphasis mine)

There we are people, THE WHOLE LAW, The Statutes and The Ordinances by The john szepietowski Hand of Moses and Commanded by The Lord – The Commandments. Here, as well, are The Holy Scriptures that demonstrate The Whole Law was recorded by Moses:

Departure 24:12 (KJV) And the LORD said unto Moses, Come up to me into the mount, and be there: and I will give you tables of stone, and a law, and precepts which I have composed; that thou mayest instruct them.

Mass migration 34:28 (KJV) And he was there with The LORD forty days and forty evenings; he did neither eat bread, nor drink water. Furthermore, he composed upon the tables the expressions of The (OLD) Covenant, The Ten rules. (Sections mine)

There it is, individuals, it can’t be easier than that and with no vagueness, and ALL recorded by Moses, so we definitely realize that there is nothing of the sort as a different ‘Formal Law’ other than in the personalities of pitiable and insidious 21st century Pharisees who present and pretend at being adherents of Yashua Anointed and offering pretentious empty talk to His Grace.

Presently the following point we should explain is this: Does The Whole Law incorporate The Ten Commandments? Or on the other hand, maybe, we could make it a more moronic inquiry: Could somebody separate The Ten Commandments from The Whole Law consequently still consider it The Whole Law? I advise you, parents, there are many ‘virtuosos’ out there that believe that they can. That, yet there are some who are cunning to such an extent ‘that they invoke this non-Scriptural new name for example the ‘Stately Law’ (as you would) and deduct that from The Whole Law. By doing this, they wrongly figure, they can leave The Ten Commandments free, convey them forward into The New Covenant period, and afterward make them restricting on those Born of God (Born Again) with the inhabiting of The Holy Spirit. This implies returning them to subjugation and judgment of The Law. How subtle malevolence and double-crosser is that? Well they are The Devil’s own, so would it be a good idea for us to expect something else?

In addition, in the event that we look for the words ‘Stately Law’ much the same as the words ‘Sacred Trinity’ and ‘Satisfaction’, in The KJV of The Bible, we won’t discover them composed there. Moreover, they additionally attempt another stunt by calling this fanciful and non-existent ‘Stylized Law’, the ‘Brief Law’, likewise not Scriptural. This, instead of their nonexistent lasting, and now isolated, Ten Commandment Law.

So what does this add up to? Simply, everything focuses to the dirty workmanship of certain sinister animals hoping to subvert Yashua Anointed’s Glorious Grace with their shrewd plan of “The Whole Law” presently deprived of the non-existent ‘Stately Law’ (it evidently nailed to the cross) letting The Ten Commandments be and still in power. Cunning eh? Well not shrewd enough for a Spirit drove Messenger and devotee of Yashua Anointed, that is without a doubt.

Presently is this ‘Stylized Law’ thought another thing? No chance, it’s been continuing for quite a long time. The best, later, instances of it were the early Protestant Reformation individuals in England for example The Puritans under Oliver Cromwell who endeavored to in a real sense power individuals to live the Ten Commandment ‘Christian Life’. This even included endeavored requirement through Parliamentary enactment which, as we probably are aware, transformed into a total calamity. The lost and unsaved individuals of England were having none of that and before long were clamoring for the arrival of a wicked ruler from banish in France looking like Charles (Stuart) II with every one of his prostitutes, paramours and mistresses. Comparative tests were endeavored in the American provinces with similar appalling outcomes. It’s a strong gold piece of Truth people for example nobody can be constrained by The Law to be a devotee of Yashua Anointed. It don’t work that way and can NEVER work that way.

Proceeding onward from my slight straying, Yashua Anointed, through Paul, at that point encourages us with this refrain of Holy Scripture:

Galatians 5:3 (KJV) For I affirm again to each man that is circumcised, that he is an indebted person to do The Whole Law.

Presently we should consider this section. What is Paul truly saying here? Is Paul saying that dutifulness, as an account holder, to do The Whole Law it MUST incorporate circumcision? Indeed, obviously he is, on the grounds that circumcision is a urgent and fundamental piece of being loyal to The Whole Law. See, fellas, you’re either heart circumcised of The Holy Spirit or you’re penis circumcised of The Whole Law. Is it accurate to say that you are of The Holy Spirit or would you say you are of submission to The Whole Law, making you denounced and bound in your own living tissue?

In the event that we, toss the Gentile condition in with the general mish-mash, would they say they are limited by the actual circumcision of The Whole Law or, whenever called by The Father to His Son, do they become exclusively circumcised Spiritually in their souls? This isn’t advanced science individuals and we need to get these fundamental Grace Truths profound situated in our souls and psyches or we’ll perpetually be plugs thrown around on the sea waves.

Discussing threw plugs, we presently have James advising us explicitly where we ought to be standing for example under Yashua Anointed’s Glorious Grace:

James 2:10 (KJV) For whosoever will keep The Whole Law, but affront in one point, he is blameworthy of all.

Presently I need every one of you Whole Law breakers out there to disclose to me how you’re going meet ALL the necessities of The Whole Law, which will incorporate actual circumcision, dusk Friday to nightfall Saturday Sabbath keeping, creature forfeits, the dietary laws and the non-wearing of blended fabrics, to give some examples, and not stay blameworthy of overstepping The Whole Law? I will presently remind every one of those grandiose ‘salvation by works’ Whole Law Keepers out there of what Paul said to the Colossians:

Col 2:14 (KJV) Blotting out the penmanship of statutes that was against us, which was in opposition to us, and removed it from the way, nailing it to his cross.

Notice the word ‘mandates’ and from the Greek MSS we get:

G1378 – doctrine – canine’- mah – from the base of G1380; A LAW (common, stylized or clerical): – order, statute.

How proper is that for each one of those canines of The WHOLE Law? Canine mama!! From which we get our English word ‘stubborn’ which means, and I quote from The Free Dictionary: “Portrayed by a definitive, presumptuous affirmation of dubious or unprovable standards”.

There we have it, parents, a brief summation of everything the Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion, on the whole its appearances, depends on – doubtful and unprovable standards!! At the end of the day they make it up as they go – simply ask old Papa, he’ll advise you.

Related Post